Pricing Login
Back to blog results

March 22, 2022 By George Gerchow

Okta evolving situation: Am I impacted?

With so many simultaneous events going on, heightened awareness in response to state actors, US President Biden’s cybersecurity call-to-action, and the Microsoft Event, all of us need to remain aware and vigilant as supply chain attacks continue. We highly recommend taking a proactive approach to secure your environment with a defense-in-depth strategy and appropriate monitoring. 

Early today, news outlets reported the recent compromise of a support engineer's laptop at the Identity and Authentication (IAM) firm, Okta. Soon thereafter, Okta’s Chief Security Officer, David Bradbury, blogged that the Okta service has not been breached and remains fully operational.

Our Global Operations Center investigated Okta’s evolving situation and so far we have no evidence that Sumo Logic, our employees or services are impacted in any way. 

Sumo Logic customers 

If you are a Sumo Logic customer or if you are trialing Sumo Logic services, we can help you determine if you are at risk. 

You can use the Okta App for Sumo Logic to get started with securing your environment by using the Okta logs to determine this potential compromise and much more, including:

  • Identify top 10 user account lockouts in the last 24 hours
  • Correlate user account lockout with a successful login
  • Identify abnormal user activities
  • Perform geo-velocity analysis
  • Detect successful and failed logins
  • Monitor admin activities
  • Identify accounts with MFA disabled

Some examples are below:

  • Account granted SSO Administrator privileges
  • External support access to SSO environment
  • Password or MFA reset activity by unexpected accounts

Example attack paths

Below, we’ll attempt to walk through some of the attack paths an attacker might take to attack your organization via SSO. Remember that the below searches are best used for general SSO security monitoring, investigations or feeding an entity risk score for risk aggregation, like Sumo’s Cloud SIEM.

The searches we provide throughout the blog are based on Okta logs but can be easily updated for use against any SSO provider log.

Supply chain

An attacker that manages to compromise any SSO provider directly and subsequently uses that to access or manipulate customer environments would fall under a supply chain attack. Defenders should monitor for unusual or unexpected access from the SSO provider.

Unexpected SSO provider service access

In the example below, we’ll use the Continuous Intelligence Platform™ (CIP) to search for any activity from Okta accounts that should be further investigated.

| json field=_raw "eventType"
| json field=_raw "displayMessage"
| json field=_raw "outcome.result" as outcome
| json field=_raw "actor.type"
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as act_id
| json field=_raw "actor.displayName"
| json field=_raw "target[0].alternateId" as target_id
| json field=_raw "target[0].displayName" as target_Name
| where act_id != "[email protected]"
| count eventType,displayMessage,outcome,act_id,target_id

The next search (which we would advise be set up to generate an alert when seen) indicates that a session impersonation event has occurred. This should only occur if Okta administrative access has been requested by an organization.

_sourceCategory=*okta* "user.session.impersonation.initiate"
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as user
| json field=_raw "outcome.result" as result
| json field=_raw "outcome.reason" as outcome
| json field=_raw "eventType" as event
| json field=_raw "client.userAgent.rawUserAgent" as user_agent
| json field=_raw "client.userAgent.os" as os
| json field=_raw "client.ipAddress" as srcIP

Anomalous password resets

An attacker might also reset user passwords or reset MFA. Looking for instances where unusual accounts are resetting passwords or MFA might warrant further analysis.

_sourceCategory=*okta* "user.account.reset_password" OR "user.mfa.factor.deactivate" OR "user.mfa.factor.reset_all"
| json field=_raw "eventType"
| json field=_raw "published" as time
| json field=_raw "displayMessage"
| json field=_raw "outcome.result" as outcome
| json field=_raw "actor.type"
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as act_id
| json field=_raw "actor.displayName"
| json field=_raw "target[0].alternateId" as target_id
| json field=_raw "target[0].displayName" as target_Name
| where act_id != target_id
//| where !(act_id matches "<expected user>" OR act_id matches "*expected user>*")
| count time,eventType,displayMessage,outcome,act_id,target_id

Credential theft

The attacks you are most likely to see are attacks against employee credentials, typically in the form of phishing, password spray attacks and MFA fatigue attacks.

Password spray attacks

Password spray attacks can take many forms—and security teams should keep an eye for the signs of an ongoing password spray attack.

General awareness - deviations in failed logins

It’s not a bad idea to keep an eye on spikes or baseline deviations in failed logins to your SSO provider. Establish a baseline of unique accounts with failed logins to your SSO and look for outliers.

This may help identify low and slow password spray attacks and provides a decent 10,000-foot view of attacks or probes against your SSO.

High volume password spray

One of our favorite ways to identify active password spray attacks is to look for a spike in SSO failed logins sourcing from the same ASN. Attackers can change the source of their password spray easily, so building your search around a source IP is too narrow. We’ve found grouping by the source ASN and putting a 30 or 60-minute time window around it is the sweet spot.

_sourceCategory=<SSO SOURCE> (failure AND "user.session.start")
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as user
| json field=_raw "eventType" as event
| json field=_raw "client.userAgent.rawUserAgent" as user_agent
| json field=_raw "client.userAgent.os" as os
| json field=_raw "client.ipAddress" as srcIP
| timeslice 30m
| lookup asn, organization from asn://default on ip=srcIP
| lookup country_name from geo://location on ip=srcIP
| values(user) as users,values(user_agent) as UA, count_distinct(user) as dist_users by organization,ASN,_timeslice,users,UA,country_name
| where dist_users > 10

Another way to look at authentication failures:

_source="SSO Source" "failure" !("radius")
| json field=_raw "request.ipChain[0].ip" as request_ip nodrop
| json field=_raw "request.ipChain[0]" as request_country nodrop
| json field=_raw "request.ipChain[0].geographicalContext.state" as request_state nodrop
| json field=_raw "target[0].type" as target_0_type nodrop
| json field=_raw "target[*].alternateId" as target_altid nodrop
| json field=_raw "target[0].alternateId" as target0_altid nodrop
| json field=_raw "target[1].alternateId" as target1_altid nodrop
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" nodrop
| json field=_raw "client.ipAddress" nodrop
| json field=_raw "outcome.result" as result nodrop
| json field=_raw "securityContext.asNumber" as asn nodrop
| json field=_raw "securityContext.asOrg" as asn_org nodrop
| json field=_raw "securityContext.isp" as isp nodrop
| json field=_raw "client.userAgent.rawUserAgent" as user_agent nodrop
//| where !(asn_org matches “*[Your Organizations ASN]*” )
| timeslice 30m
| values(target_altid) as users,values(asn_org) as asn_org,values(request_country) as country,count_distinct(target_altid) as target_count, count group by request_ip,user_agent,_timeslice
| where target_count > 10

Expanding the search to look for spikes in failed logins over a short time window (10 minutes) can also prove useful but can sometimes generate false positives. Think Monday morning when everyone is first logging in or after a holiday break and no one can remember their password.

MFA push notification fatigue

Adding an additional layer of security on top of SSO is recommended, and the most common method for doing this is in the form of push notifications. Once valid credentials have been provided to the SSO platform, an MFA push notification will be sent to a pre-enrolled device that requires accepting or acknowledging the attempt to complete the login process.

Once an attacker has a username and password, they can attempt to initiate a logon with the hope that the victim unknowingly or unintentionally acknowledges the push notification. Believe us when we tell you that this happens more often than you think!

To increase their chance of success, attackers will flood or spam victims with push notifications. Okta published a great blog on this attack technique in early March 2022.

We’ve adapted their detection for use in Sumo’s CIP:

_source=<SSO LOG SOURCE> (user.authentication.auth_via_mfa or OKTA_VERIFY_PUSH)
| json field=_raw "outcome.result" as result
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as user
| timeslice 10m
| if(result="SUCCESS",1,0) as success| if(result="FAILURE",1,0) as failure
| count as total_pushes,sum(success) as success, sum(failure) as failure by user,_timeslice
| failure/total_pushes as push_fail_ratio
| "No Finding" as finding
| if(failure=total_pushes AND total_pushes>1,"Authentication attempts not successful because multiple pushes denied",finding) as finding
| if(total_pushes=0,"Multiple pushes sent and ignored",finding) as finding
| if(success>0 AND total_pushes>3,"Multiple pushes sent, eventual successful authentication!",finding) as finding
| if(push_fail_ratio>.1,"High push fail Ratio with successful login detected",finding) as finding
| where finding = "High push fail Ratio with successful login detected" and total_pushes > 1

This search will identify instances where an account has been observed with a high number of push notifications sent with multiple failures with at least one successful login.

Post SSO compromise activity

Once an attacker steals credentials and successfully gets a victim to accept a push notification, they have some form of access to the organization and its data. We’ve observed attackers performing a variety of actions following initial access, which we will discuss below.

Please note that any results that may return from the below searches do not indicate a compromise has occurred and should be considered in aggregate with other events of interest associated with the account in question.

Interesting MFA and password reset activity

If an attacker has managed to compromise an SSO account, they might reset the account password and update and take control of the victim’s MFA. The below CIP search is also looking at Okta data and identifying any accounts that have had both an MFA update and password reset event within a specified time window.

_source=<SSO LOG SOURCE> (user.account.reset_password or user.mfa.factor.update)
| json field=_raw "eventType" as action
| if(action matches"*reset_password*",1,0) as reset_password
| if(action matches"*user.mfa.factor.update*",1,0) as user_mfa_factor_update
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as user
| json field=_raw "target[*].alternateId" as target_user //identifies target, rather than [email protected]
| count, sum(user_mfa_factor_update) as user_mfa_factor_update, sum(reset_password) as reset_password by target_user
| where user_mfa_factor_update>1 and reset_password>1

Unusual SSO app access

One of the behaviors that we often observe following initial access is the attacker exploring all of the applications the compromised account has access to. A user may have access to dozens of published applications, but usually, only access a small number of those apps daily.

The behavior of normal user application access looks very different than an attacker who has just gained access to a victim’s application portal SSO. Imagine the attacker drooling when they see SalesForce, GitHub, Confluence, Slack or PowerBI applications available for access! These applications are a goldmine and you can bet that an attacker will attempt to access as many of these applications as possible to discover what data they can steal.

User application access deviation

Let’s look for accounts that trigger a deviation for the number of distinct applications that are being accessed by an account. If a legitimate user normally accesses five apps a day, but we observe the account accessing 20 apps, that might be something worth noting.

Unauthorized app access attempts

An attacker that is engaging in discovery activity using compromised SSO credentials will likely attempt to access applications that the account does not have the authorization to access. These violations will often have an associated log event, which can be useful for defenders attempting to identify suspicious activity. We can use another CIP search to identify accounts that have attempted to access multiple applications that the account is not authorized to access.

_sourceCategory=<SSO LOG SOURCE> (app.generic.unauth_app_access_attempt OR OR app.oauth2.client_id_rate_limit_warning OR app.oauth2.invalid_client_credentials OR app.oauth2.invalid_client_ids OR app.oauth2.token.detect_reuse)
| json field=_raw "actor.alternateId" as user
| json field=_raw "eventType" as event
| json field=_raw "target[0].displayName" as appName
| timeslice 3d
| values(appName) as appNames, values(event) as event_type, count_distinct(appName) as unique_count by user,_timeslice,appNames,event_type
| where unique_count >=2


Sumo Logic CIP makes easy work of slicing and dicing your SSO log data to identify potential signs of compromised credentials. Furthermore, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM provides out-of-the-box security rules for normalized authentication log data and additional rules specific to SSO providers. Signals generated from these rules apply risk to entities, and Cloud SIEM automatically creates Insights if risk thresholds are exceeded. This provides customers with a powerful security solution they can easily adapt and custom tailor to their specific environment.

The searches shared above can be used to create dashboards for daily review, trigger email alerts based on various parameters to notify your security team of activity of interest, or best of all, send an event to Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM to contribute to an entity risk model.

To see for yourself, request a demo of Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM today or reach out directly to Sumo Logic.

About us

Sumo Logic Threat Labs and Sumo Logic Global Operations Center (GOC) are two distinct organizations within Sumo Logic partnering to safeguard Sumo Logic's customers, their data, and their organizations from emerging threats, inject security DNA throughout Sumo Logic, and contribute to the broader security community. We do this by monitoring threat activity to produce and distribute actionable intelligence, detection content and security guidance.

Complete visibility for DevSecOps

Reduce downtime and move from reactive to proactive monitoring.

Sumo Logic cloud-native SaaS analytics

Build, run, and secure modern applications and cloud infrastructures.

Start free trial
George Gerchow

George Gerchow

CSO and SVP of IT

As Sumo Logic's Chief Security Officer (CSO), George Gerchow brings 18 years of information technology and systems management expertise to the application of IT processes and disciplines. His expertise impacts the security, compliance, and operational status of complex, heterogeneous, virtual and cloud computing environments. George's practical experience and insight from managing the infrastructures of some of the world's largest corporate and government institutions, make him a highly regarded speaker and invited panelist on topics including cloud secure architecture design, virtualization, configuration management, operational security and compliance. George was one of the original founders of the VMware Center for Policy and Compliance and he holds CISSP, ITIL, Cisco, and Microsoft Certifications. George is also an active Board Member for several technology start ups and the co-author of Center for Internet Security - Quick Start Cloud Infrastructure Benchmark v1.0.0 and is a Faculty Member for IANS - Institute of Applied Network Security

More posts by George Gerchow.

People who read this also enjoyed